Author: Dusan Dobes
Date: 06:13:48 12/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 1999 at 08:49:19, Andrew Williams wrote: >Over the last few days, I have been fascinated by the discussions on CCC >about positional sacrifices. Some of the discussion has centred on the value >assigned to the attack that is obtained after the sacrifice and I was wondering >how other programs evaluated the position after Hossa's sac: > >r3q1k1/ppp1rp2/2n1b2Q/8/2P5/3B4/PPP2RPP/5RK1 b - - 0 2 > >This is after 1. Bxh6 gxh6 2. Qxh6 from the original position posted by >Peter McKenzie. PostModernist's static evaluation of the position is presented >below. Essentially, it thinks that White is winning by 0.71. The ATTACKTOTAL >score is generated by analyzing the squares around the King to see how many of >them are attacked and what sorts of pieces are attacking them. Please note that >not all the factors that contribute to PM's score are included in the output >below. > >Could other programmers post similar information? I believe that even an >overall static evaluation would be interesting. > >Cheers > >Andrew Williams Phalanx XXI static evaluation scores this position as +3.05 for white. Material gives -1.5, black king safety +5.76. Dusan Dobes
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.