Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 19:01:14 01/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2000 at 20:50:03, Sune Larsson wrote: >...of Zurich International 1953 saw Taimanov facing Geller in King's Indian. >After Geller's 9th move we have the following position: > >[D]r1bqr1k1/pp1n1pbp/3p1np1/2pPp3/2P1P3/2N2N2/PP3PPP/R1BQRBK1 w - - 0 1 > >Bronstein thinks this position is better for white as it ensures white >greater freedom to maneuver within his own lines, since he has three ranks, >while black has only two. Do you think (know) that this pawnformation - >white: c4-d5-e4 black: c5-d6-e5, is easier to handle for a computerprogram, >playing white rather than coping with the black piecies?? > >Sune Hi Sune, I think most programs will handle both of those pawn structures poorly. These positions require lots of piece manuevering and careful timing of the pawn levers. If I had to pick a side for a computer to play, it would be White, but only because of the space advantage that Bronstein mentioned. --Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.