Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:45:41 01/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 31, 2000 at 09:19:50, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On January 31, 2000 at 09:02:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On January 31, 2000 at 05:06:38, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>> >>>Does any programmer use fuzzy programming within his program? >>>If not, would it be helpful and make it easier or better to evaluate positions? >>>AFAIK fuzzy is an ideal tool for combining several different, even complementary >>>evaluation parameters, and chess programming has a large number of evaluation >>>functions... >>> >>>Opinions? >> >> >>I would suspect that _all_ chess programs have some 'fuzzy logic' in them. >>one example is recognizing the stonewall pattern. If you require the exact >>pawn structure, you get zapped if he forgets to push the c2 pawn to c3 for >>example. If you 'fuzzy match' one pawn missing doesn't invalidate the >>pattern. > >I see clear difference between using some form of fuzzy logic, cq see >current chessprograms as a form of fuzzy logic, and making usage >of 100% fuzzy programming. > >The methods as decribed in fuzzy logic programming are to say with an >understatement 'naive', or even better 'quickly done to produce a paper'. > >Vincent > >>I certainly do it... Nobody said 100% fuzzy logic programming. I don't do that. I do use fuzzy logic in a few places when I want to "almost match" something, for example.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.