Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Terrible User Interfaces in Chess Programs

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 06:59:38 02/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 12, 2000 at 09:23:43, Albert Silver wrote:

>On February 12, 2000 at 02:09:56, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>On February 12, 2000 at 01:45:50, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On February 12, 2000 at 01:09:07, Vincent Vega wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 12, 2000 at 00:50:02, Albert Silver wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>What is the best-selling chess program?  What made that program best-selling
>>>>>>when it's strength was well behind other?
>>>>>
>>>>>Best-selling program whose strength is well behind others.... Beats the heck out
>>>>>of me. Which?
>>>>
>>>>Whose strength _was_ well behind others.  Don't twist my words.  A: Chessmaster.
>>>
>>>Why do you believe that Chessmaster was well behind the others in strength.  I
>>>believe quite the opposite -- that it is and has been one of the very strongest
>>>programs.
>>
>>Chessmaster was a best seller back in the days of CM2000 and CM2100.  The first
>>"wow!" chess engine from them didn't come until CM4000, years later.
>>
>>Dave
>
>I tend to disagree. When CM2000 and then CM2100 first came out, it came out not
>for the PC, but the Apple II. On the Apple the best program available at that
>time was Sargon III to my knowledge, and CM was not inferior when it came out.
>It was my first program, and it sure wowed me then. Of course, considering the
>fact that I had just learned to play, that wasn't all that difficult, but as I
>got stronger, I played the both of them, and still preferred CM.
>
>                                       Albert Silver

Hmm.  I recall CM3000 being *seriously* outclassed by the competition.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.