Author: Andrew Dados
Date: 14:22:41 02/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 28, 2000 at 16:28:58, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On February 28, 2000 at 16:20:21, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On February 28, 2000 at 13:51:25, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>Who isn't including EP status in the hash signature? I can't imagine _anyone_ >>>not doing this. It leads to simple failures that are easy to predict. >> >>I'm not sure the authors would appreciate it if I started talking about their >>algorithms in an open forum like this. I'm sure you understand. >> >>As for knowingly adding bugs--well, duh. I don't expect you to keep the damn >>"bug" IN. And you yourself said it would be easy to prove your point. So do it. >> >>-Tom > >I believe Bob already did it - he said that he lost the game because of not >storing EP bit in hash signature. For me that means that at least for one >program hashing EP bit makes a difference. > >For other program that can matter less, of course - e.g. if you don't use hashed >score from the previous moves, error chances are decreasing. > >Eugene I remember Vince saying DIEP lost one tournament game due to not hashing ep back then, too. And I don't think two conditionals will slow your program much... -Andrew-
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.