Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 14:45:59 04/11/00

Go up one level in this thread

I think we've said what we're going to say about the judgment issue. I think I'm
right, you think you're right. Fine. It was the moderators' call to make, maybe
we made the wrong one, oh well.

What you still haven't answered to my satisfaction is this: if the situation was
so clear to you, why didn't you say anything?

I was trying to determine RR's identity for probably 24 hours. You're saying
that his identity (i.e., not Ossi) was clear to you immediately. So what were
you doing the whole time? Were you thinking something like, "I know who RR
really is, and the moderators don't, and they're making a big mistake, ha ha!"
In other words, do you really like having big arguments with me more than you
like to help your fellow man? Consider that a rhetorical question if you want.

-Tom

• Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 19:09:06 04/11/00
  • Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 21:24:34 04/11/00
    • Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 07:40:19 04/12/00
      • Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 09:41:18 04/12/00
        • Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Bruce Moreland 10:28:40 04/12/00
  • Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Mogens Larsen 20:05:59 04/11/00
    • Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Dan Ellwein 04:10:12 04/12/00
      • Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 10:05:39 04/12/00
        • Now it's clear that this horse has been beaten to death. KarinsDad 11:57:16 04/12/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.