Author: blass uri
Date: 01:42:23 05/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2000 at 03:38:07, CLiebert wrote: >On May 08, 2000 at 01:38:11, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>"Fritz will not have access to its endgame modules" >> >>What is this meaning?? Fritz is not playing with full strength!! Pity... >> >>Jouni > > >Humans havn´t acess to endgame bases too. >Equal chances. >Thats the reason for this I assume. >But if this is the reason fritz shouldn´t use his powerbooks too?! >It´s the same matter and seems to be consequent under these considerations. >But may be the book access is accepted as an essential part of a chess >program today. Question of definition ... > >Christian I think it is better to give humans excess to endgame tablebases instead of not giving the computer excess to endgame tablebases. I do not like doing things that reduce the level of the computers. If humans think that computers are too strong it is better to help the humans and not to reduce the level of the computers. I do not think that programs are too strong and I think that there is no justification to give humans equal conditions about tablebases. Other possible idea for the future when programs become stronger are: 1)Letting humans to use chess books(computer programs are also allowed to do it). 2)Letting humans to move pieces in another board and to write notes to help them to play better. 3)Letting both sides to take back moves in the game when for every take back you have less 5 minutes on the clock so you cannot take back moves forever or in time trouble. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.