Author: Chessfun
Date: 06:22:51 05/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 2000 at 03:11:28, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 13, 2000 at 01:14:33, Chessfun wrote: > >>It would seem from Mathias email that is true. >>It is a little confusing since earlier Christophe and Dr. Hyatt were >>writing about the issue. Christophe wrote it could be turned off >>as position learning wouldn't help the tests and Dr. Hyatt wrote against >>the idea of turning it off. Could be that Dr. Hyatt wasn't aware learning >>was off in the Fritz GUI. Or was there some confusion as they may have been >>thinking of book learning which is irrelevant with Nunn 1. > >Apparently neither Christophe Theron nor Dr. Hyatt (nor I and others, except >maybe Pavel) were aware of the lack of positional learning, but they don't own a >copy of the program AFAIK. You own a copy of Fritz, so who do you think there is >to blame? If it been known beforehand, then a _lot_ of controversy and useless >posts could have been avoided. Not really true. Since the issue of positional learning was just another issue related to testing parameters. Posts on the issue were just questions within a myriad of other questions. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.