Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:53:25 07/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2000 at 15:48:59, Jari Huikari wrote: >On July 17, 2000 at 15:23:12, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: > >>"I agree with pete galati - x should know better" >>"I agree with pete galati - (however) pete galati should know better" >>"I agree with pete galati - (I) should know better" >>"I agree with y - pete galati should know better" >> >>Who is x? Who is y? *Is* Pete Galati or isn't he? Or is he just a bit Galati? >> >>I'm thoroughly confused by this kind of ambush posting. >>But hey, I suggest the best answer is: >>Pete Galati doesn't know better. > >No, no! Brian agrees with Pete Galati. Together they (Brian and Pete) should >know better than Jerry (alone). This is just an example of democracy. Simple, >eh? Why don't we just go with pure pronouns, and then it can mean anything you like. ;-)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.