Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Which Algorithm is considered the best ?

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 12:56:04 08/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 06, 2000 at 16:36:15, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>Show me an MTD program that uses less nodes a ply as DIEP does.
>
>What diep is doing is very simple in search:
>
>  PVS (starting with -infinite)
>  check extensions
>  checks in qsearch
>  nullmove R=3
>  no other crap. no pruning. Perhaps at WMCC i prune a bit,
>  but that's because against computers playing is different.
>
>  Yet i'm missing programs using less nodes a ply with MTD.
>  I"m missing *any* deep searching program that uses MTD actually.


Anmon, a french chess program, uses MTD(f). It is a strong program.

If you are not pruning in the tree, then MTD(f) should be better for you. I
don't use MTD(f) because I use the value of alpha and beta to prune in the tree,
and with MTD(f) this kind of pruning makes the search really unstable (you get a
fail-high, and when you re-search with a higher window you get a fail-low,
oops).



    Christophe



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.