Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 07:14:15 08/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2000 at 09:13:15, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On August 11, 2000 at 08:34:01, Aaron Tay wrote: > >>You seem to hate the idea of moderators..My point is that if moderators are >>not free to moderate, it would defeat the point of nominating and electing >>them regardless how level headed they are.. >You don't want to elect someone that rarely posts either, because you need some >kind of experience or frame of reference as a poster to be a good moderator >IMHO. Definitely..No disagreements here.. >It will help you estimate the situations where you're not personally involved. >And as long as all three moderators agree on deleting a post in a thread where >a moderator participates, then the procedure should be alright. >The ability to participate freely shouldn't be limited for anyone, moderator or >not. Probably not. But if you weren't inclined to participate in every thread in the past anyway, than being a moderator wouldn't mean giving up any right of posting at all.. Actually by my citeria, you would be suitable..You might post a lot but, you don't seem to get into personal arguements much..At least not in the chess related matters.. I notice that Moderator related threads is another matter.. >Best wishes... >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.