Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 15:23:09 11/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 16:05:40, Thorsten Czub wrote: >which one ? why ? examples. quotes. be exact ? >or again jumping on people. I'm not jumping on anyone. I choose to differentiate between reviews and personal opinions. The former requires objectivity IMO. >isn't anybody allowed to review/like what he wants ? Absolutely, but there's a question of credibility to be answered. >what a nonsense. the grandmasters cannot find out about the strength. >you have no clue. >they evaluate something as strong that reminds them on themselves, >but they do not see a strong program. That is absolute nonsense. >if the grandmasters believe chessbase programs are strong, why don't the >chessbase programs (especially the praised fritz) is not winning tournaments ? Maybe because tournaments is mostly a question of luck. >do the other chess programs not know what your famous grandmasters said ? I doubt that chess programs have the intellectual capability to understand something like that. >i am capable of buying the programs, thank you mogens. That is irrelevant. >the conflict of interests comes from different things mogens. >when people are payed to write positive about certain programs. You're getting paid by receiving a program for free. It represents monetary value the same as getting paid in chickens would. >you know what i mean. No, I don't know. Who's getting paid to write positive things about certain programs? Mogens.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.