Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 11:52:27 01/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 1998 at 14:42:14, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >SEE - the static exchange evaluator can be used >to improve upon the usual capture search move >ordering or move selection. > >Option 1) >SEE is used instead of usual sort to order losing >capture sequences at the bottom of the list, equal >sequences above that, and winning sequences at >the top? > >Option 2) >Or, instead, should it be used to eliminate >losing capture sequences altogether from being >searched. > >Option 1a) >Use SEE as in option 1 but also in the full-width >search for sorting capture sequences > >Option 2) >Same as option 2 but also in full-width > >Are there other choises of how to use SEE? Which >have proven best? And what kind of a speedup do you >see for the various options? Try it and see. You can write a SEE, do the experiments, and report them. I'd be interested in seeing what the results are. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.