Author: Lin Harper
Date: 11:40:15 12/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2000 at 11:39:14, leonid wrote: >On December 01, 2000 at 20:36:27, walter irvin wrote: > >>i have no doubt that you have a monster of a system , but i still believe that a >>human will always find a way . not all people for sure .but the best player will >>always be a human because people are so devious , sneaky , slippery,and cheat >>,actually hate to lose .plus some people are just super smart , like a morphy .i >>really believe that if morphy played deep blue a 6 game match morphy would have >>won .there will always come a person who will be able to beat the machine .true >>maybe if the person did not know who they were playing the machine would win . >>but the human does know ,plays his style based on that . > >I think that human is inevitable looser in the chess game at long run. I doubt >very much that chess game, as game for human, will stay alive more that one >century. As calligraphy became pointless with invention of typewriter, human >game will fade out as soon as computers brain will become somewhat mature. >Computers now just started their life. Never mind! Even now they proved to be >able to beat almost every human while they are in deep infancy. > >8 men tables is good but not that important for computers final win. When >computer will be strong enough, it will win each chess game well before game >will reach its final stage. > >Leonid. Yes, but won't this make humans stronger too? I mean, then computers will rewrite openings books, and find flaws in our endgames too. I accept we will only be able to compete with them for a limited time, but they will ultimately make the game more, not less, exciting for us. They don't allow forklift trucks in weightlifting competitions.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.