Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 09:07:42 01/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2001 at 10:53:43, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >Sorry let's discriminate between nullmove and FHR. >What FHR is doing is very incorrect, what nullmove >does is correct, though for some manoeuvres you might need >a bit bigger depth. I know FHR and nullmove are totally different, but I wanted to get my point across why I consider FHR to be a negative extension and nullmove not. Based on the replies it looks as if I will have to explain it better ;) -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.