Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 09:25:06 01/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2001 at 12:07:42, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On January 25, 2001 at 10:53:43, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Sorry let's discriminate between nullmove and FHR. >>What FHR is doing is very incorrect, what nullmove >>does is correct, though for some manoeuvres you might need >>a bit bigger depth. > >I know FHR and nullmove are totally different, but I >wanted to get my point across why I consider FHR to >be a negative extension and nullmove not. > >Based on the replies it looks as if I will have to >explain it better ;) I think I understand your point about null-move, in fact, if I understand what many people do with null-move I agree. What is FHR? sorry for a newbie question... Regards, Miguel > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.