Author: Scott Carmichael
Date: 13:23:56 03/27/98
Go up one level in this thread
OK, lets get one thing straight, my life , or your opinion of it isn't the issue here. Since you choose to try and make that the point, it's shows how common you actually are. The facts I have are facts that I have seen and wittnessed only, not those that may come as rumors or fantasy, I am here to see solid proof in this issue, proof which you want to disclaim obviously. My first purchase of these 2 programs was HIARCS6, with which I was impressed until I started playing manual games against a friend who was using Fritz 5. At this time, I began to earnestly believe that Fritz is the strongest total package available at this time. The data continued to mount in favor of Fritz, but I didn't colloect this data for others, only to decide for myself which is better. A person cannot make an intelligent decision without data , or as you would rather not hear, PROOF !! As Fritz was the rogram in question, I only attempted to recreate the games from those that Fritz was playing, not those of HIARCS 6, even if they were games betweeb the two,. No one has ever disputed the games played by HIARCS 6 until you posted this. So now you are accusing HIARCS 6 of throwing games to Fritz 5 ? Thats a huge statement to make, but I'm sure you have the PROOF, don't you. Before you claimed to live without the need of prrof, but now you have done research, and have data to prove what you claim. Interesting conlfict of claims, and of that, we have the prrof. So, now that you are conducting these imperical examinations, and admitting that proof is required, why bother to argue.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.