Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :)

Author: Duncan Stanley

Date: 09:22:43 04/19/01

On April 19, 2001 at 11:48:08, Christophe Theron wrote:

>
>OK, let's see if somebody can come up with a decent solution to this problem.
>Please, show me that you are not all deeply asleep and try to find creative
>solution(s). There are actually many ways to solve the problem.
>
>

Please teecher !!! Can I answer !!!

Modify the eval() and the search() a little by date/time to give another style.

Can I go to the top of the class now ???

Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Robert Hyatt 10:36:27 04/19/01
- Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Duncan Stanley 10:59:32 04/19/01
- Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Dan Andersson 10:53:39 04/19/01
  - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Christophe Theron 10:59:14 04/19/01
    - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Dan Andersson 11:04:55 04/19/01
- Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Christophe Theron 10:47:30 04/19/01
  - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Volker Pittlik 13:19:05 04/19/01
    - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Christophe Theron 14:18:06 04/19/01
- Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Miguel A. Ballicora 10:47:04 04/19/01
  - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Robert Hyatt 05:55:33 04/20/01
  - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Christophe Theron 10:50:47 04/19/01
Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Dan Andersson 09:37:12 04/19/01
- Yes, well. Computer Chess is sneaky, no? [n/t] Duncan Stanley 09:43:56 04/19/01
  - Quite!(nt) Dan Andersson 09:46:10 04/19/01
- Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Christophe Theron 09:43:05 04/19/01
  - A mathematician's go on this (even sneakier) Shep 12:02:39 04/19/01
    - Re: A mathematician's go on this (even sneakier) Dan Andersson 14:05:12 04/19/01
    - Re: A mathematician's go on this (even sneakier) James Swafford 13:37:19 04/19/01
      - Re: A mathematician's go on this (even sneakier) Shep 14:05:28 04/20/01
      - Re: A mathematician's go on this (even sneakier) Paul 13:45:03 04/19/01
  - Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 09:46:45 04/19/01
    - Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Christophe Theron 09:50:12 04/19/01
      - Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 09:55:47 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Christophe Theron 10:01:53 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 10:54:30 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Christophe Theron 11:05:14 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 11:29:42 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Uri Blass 14:15:33 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba 04:27:56 04/20/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba 04:50:01 04/20/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 15:33:48 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Christophe Theron 14:14:11 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 15:06:37 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Christophe Theron 15:32:20 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 15:55:47 04/19/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Christophe Theron 09:50:24 04/20/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 10:33:09 04/20/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Robert Raese 18:04:45 04/20/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Uri Blass 11:54:01 04/20/01
        
        Re: Good suggestion, and sneaky and underhanded also. Duncan Stanley 12:16:43 04/20/01
        
        OK, you give up? So let's stop. (NT) Christophe Theron 11:50:00 04/20/01
        
        I said we'll stop, but not for the reason you quote. Duncan Stanley 12:22:55 04/20/01
        
        Re: I said we'll stop, but not for the reason you quote. Christophe Theron 16:05:56 04/20/01
Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Christophe Theron 09:34:51 04/19/01
- Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Duncan Stanley 09:51:55 04/19/01
  - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Christophe Theron 09:56:11 04/19/01
    - Re: Regarding the Kramnik match: is CCC so deeply asleep??? :) :) Duncan Stanley 09:58:53 04/19/01

This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.