Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:17:35 04/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2001 at 17:32:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On April 19, 2001 at 17:01:17, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>Oh no, not you Thorsten! > >:-))) I mean "not you asking this question", of course. >yes. i do see. >but why is it propaganda when stefan explains why he did not participate. >its obvious. I did not say that Stefan has done propaganda, I just pointed out the fact that IMO one of his points is moot. It struck me as soon as I read it, so I wanted to let people know that they were following without even thinking. Franckly I have not read the other points carefully. >enrique and the ssdf claimed to be objective testers. >IMO they out themselves as the opposite in the whole process of the match. Don't expect me to say ANYTHING against Enrique or Bertil. I do not complain against them. >i don't see your point. >if he has the program month before, he will learn how to beat it. >if you create a program than changes itself, you will weaken >the playing strength of this program. >rebel-tiger12 is not as strong as gambit-tiger1. >they have different playing styles. >and therefore also different strength. >if you change playing style, the strength changes too. The difference in playing strength between Chess Tiger and Gambit Tiger is maybe significant against computers (we do not even know), but I guess that against human players it is not the same. I think I could use both programs in order to create an unpredictable opponent, but that's not the only way to do it. >>Nobody used his brain to realize that it was not a problem. NOBODY. > >it IS a problem IMO. maybe you HAVE a different idea. than please enlighten >me how you will change the style the way that it plays as strong. >this is impossible. You think you know better than me? Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.