Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Choosing An OS For Personal Computing

Author: Graham Laight

Date: 00:59:34 05/12/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 12, 2001 at 03:22:30, Frank Phillips wrote:

>When my program is running on FICS under Linux and accessing the EGTBs
>(performing a lot of disk activity), it seems to forget to look at the input
>from the server for long periods of time, so that the opponent's clock goes
>negative.  When not accessing the EGTBs (or running under Windows) everything is
>fine.
>
>(Frustrating, since I may have to move to Linux if MS decide next that your
>first born is part of the licence fee for using their sotware, in interests of
>the consumer and to protect freedom and democracy against the evil threat of
>open source software of course.).

I'm afraid I can't help you with your specific problem, but I do think that OS
selection is an interesting subject.

If you're planning to use a chess program that can make use of the 64 bit
capabilities of non-pentium processors (e.g. Compaq Alpha), then you'll need to
use a type of Unix (e.g. Tru-64 - the type of Unix we ran on Crafty at WMCCC
2000).

However - I suspect that you're using a pentium based machine. For the time
being, I'm putting up with Bill Gate's global hegemony, and sticking with
Windows.

The trouble is, Windows is a "single user, multi-tasking" OS, wheras Unix is a
"multi-user, multi-tasking" OS. What's the point of having all that multi-user
capability overhead, unless you're setting up a business application which many
people are going to use via an X-Windows screen?

Creating X-Windows applications is not something I see many people doing any
more - the trend is towards browser-based applications. I think it's a tragedy
that the world's great shareware OS is one which I think is inappropriate for
personal computing.

I think the future of personal OSs lies in the browser. When first invented, the
browser was a really "thin" client. With the passage of time, browsers are
becoming larger and fatter applications, as more and more capability is built
into them.

Also, I think that to properly manage Windows or Unix is requiring increasing
amounts of what used to be called "Computer Operator" skills. Most people have
never had any ambition to be a computer operator, so it makes sense to select
systems that allow most of the OS operating to be done collectively for large
numbers of people - and just give people a browser to use these systems.

-g

>Any help appreciated.
>
>Frank



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.