Author: Howard Exner
Date: 14:50:34 05/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 1998 at 16:34:44, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On May 04, 1998 at 15:37:39, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On May 04, 1998 at 11:22:28, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>4 - The fact that ChessBase can tune their engines and books against the >>>opposition without allowing the other programmers to do the same, gives >>>ChessBase an obvious advantage. >> >>>Point 4) is, I think, the troublemaker, the only real one. I see two >>>ways to solve it: >>>a - ChessBase releases the autoplayer Fritz 5. >>>b - Other programmers follow the example and release auto232 versions >>>only for the SSDF. >> >>How would point b work? > >The same way it works now. My understanding of the way it works now is that just one program is using its exclusive autotester. Your point is that other programs do this so my question remains - how will it work if all say, "use only my autotester". For example if Bruce sends Ferret and says you must only test Ferret with the new Ferret-Auto X and I send them my program and say you must only use Howard-Auto Y then the two programs will never play given those specifications. Forgive me if I am missing something obvious. > >Enrique > >> If Fritz says only use my autoplayer and >>Genius says only use my autoplayer they would never play each other. >>I can't see how other programs can follow the Fritz requirement as >>no testing could be done. It has to be a universal autoplayer that all >>agree to. Why didn't Fritz use the standard autoplayer? Is the reasoning >>that other programs will autotest and find weaknesses? So what, since >>Fritz could then again improve its program in the next generation. In a >>sense >>it could thank the other programmers for finding and exploiting the >>weaknesses >>and in turn become even better.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.