Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 11:03:31 08/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2001 at 13:25:22, Chris Taylor wrote: > > >r4r1k/4bppb/2n1p2p/p1n1P3/1p1p1BNP/3P1NP1/qP2QPB1/2RR2K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0: > >1.Nf6 Bf5 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Ne1 Nxe5 4.Bxa8 Bxf6 5.Bxe5 Rxa8 6.Bxf6 gxf6 > ³ (-0.30) Depth: 7 00:00:00 112kN >1.Ne1 Rac8 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Rdc1 a4 4.h5 > = (-0.10) Depth: 7 00:00:00 115kN >1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1 axb2 5.Nd2 Qa1 6.Nb1 > = (0.16) Depth: 7 00:00:00 131kN > ² (0.40) Depth: 11 00:00:04 1229kN >1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 a4 4.Nxd4 Nxd4 5.Rxd4 b3 6.Re1 a3 7.bxa3 Qxa3 8.Qh5 > ² (0.50) Depth: 11 00:00:16 4371kN > = (0.24) Depth: 13 00:00:50 13234kN >1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Ng5 Ne7 6.Rxc8 Rxc8 7.Nxf7+ Kg8 >8.Ngxh6+ gxh6 9.Nxh6+ > ± (0.72) Depth: 13 00:01:11 19275kN > = (0.12) Depth: 16 00:15:18 280852kN >1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Nd2 Kg8 4.Ne4 Nb3 5.Nf6+ Bxf6 6.exf6 Nxc1 7.Rxc1 Na7 >8.fxg7 Rxc1+ 9.Bxc1 > ² (0.40) Depth: 16 00:27:04 495999kN >1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bg6 4.h5 Bf5 5.g4 Bh7 6.Bxf8 > ± (1.08) Depth: 16 00:52:57 980973kN > ± (1.16) Depth: 19 06:05:50 7150366kN > >(Taylor, Notts 30.08.2001) > >Chris. So you mean to tell me you're 1.2Ghz Athlon only shaves 2 hours off the time to 19 Ply compared to my 800Mhz Athlon??? bm Ng5 - NOLOT #9 r4r1k/4bppb/2n1p2p/p1n1P3/1p1p1BNP/3P1NP1/qP2QPB1/2RR2K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0: 1.Nf6 Bf5 2.Nd7 Nxd7 3.Rxc6 Bc5 ³ (-0.30) Depth: 7 00:00:00 68kN 1.Nf6 Bf5 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Ne1 Nxe5 4.Bxa8 Bxf6 5.Bxe5 Rxa8 6.Bxf6 gxf6 ³ (-0.30) Depth: 7 00:00:00 85kN 1.Ne1 Rac8 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Rdc1 a4 4.h5 = (-0.10) Depth: 7 00:00:00 115kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 h5 3.Ngh2 Qd5 4.Qc2 Bxd3 5.Qxc5 = (0.16) Depth: 7 00:00:00 131kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 Ba7 3.Rxc6 Bf5 4.Nfh2 h5 5.Rc7 hxg4 6.Bxa8 Rxa8 7.Nxg4 ² (0.58) Depth: 8 00:00:01 172kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1 axb2 5.Nd2 ² (0.38) Depth: 9 00:00:01 285kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1 ² (0.38) Depth: 10 00:00:02 522kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1 axb2 5.Nd2 Qa1 6.Nb1 ² (0.40) Depth: 11 00:00:06 1229kN 1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 Qa4 4.Rdc1 Qb5 5.Qc2 Rfd8 6.Rxc5 Bxc5 7.Qxc5 Qxd3 ² (0.50) Depth: 11 00:00:23 4371kN 1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 Qa4 4.Rdc1 Qb5 5.Qc2 Rfd8 6.Rxc5 Bxc5 7.Qxc5 Qxd3 8.Kh2 ² (0.50) Depth: 12 00:00:36 6963kN 1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 a4 4.Nxd4 Nxd4 5.Rxd4 b3 6.Re1 a3 7.bxa3 Qxa3 8.Qh5 = (0.24) Depth: 13 00:01:09 13234kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 Ba7 3.Rxc6 a4 4.Nd2 Qxb2 5.Ra6 a3 6.Bxa8 Rxa8 7.Qf3 ± (0.72) Depth: 13 00:01:39 19275kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 Ba7 3.Rxc6 a4 4.Nd2 Rac8 5.Ra6 Bb8 6.Nc4 a3 7.Ra8 Qb1+ 8.Bf1 ² (0.60) Depth: 14 00:02:06 24551kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Qc2 b3 6.Qd2 Bf5 7.Nfh2 Ne7 8.Rxc8 Rxc8 9.bxa3 Qxd2 ² (0.52) Depth: 15 00:05:18 64732kN 1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Ng5 Ne7 6.Rxc8 Rxc8 7.Nxf7+ Kg8 8.Ngxh6+ gxh6 9.Nxh6+ = (0.12) Depth: 16 00:22:54 280852kN 1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Nd2 Kg8 4.Ne4 Nb3 5.Nf6+ Bxf6 6.exf6 Nxc1 7.Rxc1 Na7 8.fxg7 Rxc1+ 9.Bxc1 ² (0.40) Depth: 16 00:39:56 495999kN 1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bf5 4.Rxc5 Bxc5 5.g4 Bg6 6.h5 Bh7 7.Bxf8 Rxf8 8.Rc1 Qb5 9.Nxh7 Kxh7 ± (1.08) Depth: 16 01:17:22 980973kN 1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bf5 4.Rxc5 Bxc5 5.g4 Bg6 6.h5 Bh7 7.Bxf8 Rxf8 8.Rc1 Qb5 9.Nxh7 Kxh7 ± (1.08) Depth: 17 01:44:39 1343476kN 1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bf5 4.g4 Bg6 5.h5 Bh7 6.Bxf8 Rxf8 7.Rxc5 Bxc5 8.Nxh7 ± (1.16) Depth: 18 04:10:48 3296287kN 1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bg6 4.h5 Bf5 5.g4 Bh7 6.Bxf8 ± (1.16) Depth: 19 08:50:43 7150366kN (Lee, Pensacola, Fl 30.08.2001) What are the best settings you've noticed for GT2? I have tried various and just use defaults.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.