Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nolot #9 & Gambit Tiger at 7+ hours 1200 Athlon

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:13:27 08/30/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 30, 2001 at 14:03:31, Joshua Lee wrote:

>On August 30, 2001 at 13:25:22, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>r4r1k/4bppb/2n1p2p/p1n1P3/1p1p1BNP/3P1NP1/qP2QPB1/2RR2K1 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:
>>
>>1.Nf6 Bf5 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Ne1 Nxe5 4.Bxa8 Bxf6 5.Bxe5 Rxa8 6.Bxf6 gxf6
>>  ³  (-0.30)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  112kN
>>1.Ne1 Rac8 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Rdc1 a4 4.h5
>>  =  (-0.10)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  115kN
>>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1 axb2 5.Nd2 Qa1 6.Nb1
>>  =  (0.16)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  131kN
>>  ²  (0.40)   Depth: 11   00:00:04  1229kN
>>1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 a4 4.Nxd4 Nxd4 5.Rxd4 b3 6.Re1 a3 7.bxa3 Qxa3 8.Qh5
>>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 11   00:00:16  4371kN
>>  =  (0.24)   Depth: 13   00:00:50  13234kN
>>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Ng5 Ne7 6.Rxc8 Rxc8 7.Nxf7+ Kg8
>>8.Ngxh6+ gxh6 9.Nxh6+
>>  ±  (0.72)   Depth: 13   00:01:11  19275kN
>>  =  (0.12)   Depth: 16   00:15:18  280852kN
>>1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Nd2 Kg8 4.Ne4 Nb3 5.Nf6+ Bxf6 6.exf6 Nxc1 7.Rxc1 Na7
>>8.fxg7 Rxc1+ 9.Bxc1
>>  ²  (0.40)   Depth: 16   00:27:04  495999kN
>>1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bg6 4.h5 Bf5 5.g4 Bh7 6.Bxf8
>>  ±  (1.08)   Depth: 16   00:52:57  980973kN
>>  ±  (1.16)   Depth: 19   06:05:50  7150366kN
>>
>>(Taylor, Notts 30.08.2001)
>>
>>Chris.
>
>So you mean to tell me you're 1.2Ghz Athlon only shaves 2 hours off the time to
>19 Ply compared to my 800Mhz Athlon???
>
>bm Ng5 - NOLOT #9
>r4r1k/4bppb/2n1p2p/p1n1P3/1p1p1BNP/3P1NP1/qP2QPB1/2RR2K1 w - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:
>
>1.Nf6 Bf5 2.Nd7 Nxd7 3.Rxc6 Bc5
>  ³  (-0.30)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  68kN
>1.Nf6 Bf5 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Ne1 Nxe5 4.Bxa8 Bxf6 5.Bxe5 Rxa8 6.Bxf6 gxf6
>  ³  (-0.30)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  85kN
>1.Ne1 Rac8 2.Ra1 Qb3 3.Rdc1 a4 4.h5
>  =  (-0.10)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  115kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 h5 3.Ngh2 Qd5 4.Qc2 Bxd3 5.Qxc5
>  =  (0.16)   Depth: 7   00:00:00  131kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 Ba7 3.Rxc6 Bf5 4.Nfh2 h5 5.Rc7 hxg4 6.Bxa8 Rxa8 7.Nxg4
>  ²  (0.58)   Depth: 8   00:00:01  172kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1 axb2 5.Nd2
>  ²  (0.38)   Depth: 9   00:00:01  285kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1
>  ²  (0.38)   Depth: 10   00:00:02  522kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Qd1 axb2 5.Nd2 Qa1 6.Nb1
>  ²  (0.40)   Depth: 11   00:00:06  1229kN
>1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 Qa4 4.Rdc1 Qb5 5.Qc2 Rfd8 6.Rxc5 Bxc5 7.Qxc5 Qxd3
>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 11   00:00:23  4371kN
>1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 Qa4 4.Rdc1 Qb5 5.Qc2 Rfd8 6.Rxc5 Bxc5 7.Qxc5 Qxd3
>8.Kh2
>  ²  (0.50)   Depth: 12   00:00:36  6963kN
>1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Rc4 a4 4.Nxd4 Nxd4 5.Rxd4 b3 6.Re1 a3 7.bxa3 Qxa3 8.Qh5
>  =  (0.24)   Depth: 13   00:01:09  13234kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 Ba7 3.Rxc6 a4 4.Nd2 Qxb2 5.Ra6 a3 6.Bxa8 Rxa8 7.Qf3
>  ±  (0.72)   Depth: 13   00:01:39  19275kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 Ba7 3.Rxc6 a4 4.Nd2 Rac8 5.Ra6 Bb8 6.Nc4 a3 7.Ra8 Qb1+ 8.Bf1
>  ²  (0.60)   Depth: 14   00:02:06  24551kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Qc2 b3 6.Qd2 Bf5 7.Nfh2 Ne7 8.Rxc8
>Rxc8 9.bxa3 Qxd2
>  ²  (0.52)   Depth: 15   00:05:18  64732kN
>1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Ng5 Ne7 6.Rxc8 Rxc8 7.Nxf7+ Kg8
>8.Ngxh6+ gxh6 9.Nxh6+
>  =  (0.12)   Depth: 16   00:22:54  280852kN
>1.Nf6 Rac8 2.Nxh7 Kxh7 3.Nd2 Kg8 4.Ne4 Nb3 5.Nf6+ Bxf6 6.exf6 Nxc1 7.Rxc1 Na7
>8.fxg7 Rxc1+ 9.Bxc1
>  ²  (0.40)   Depth: 16   00:39:56  495999kN
>1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bf5 4.Rxc5 Bxc5 5.g4 Bg6 6.h5 Bh7 7.Bxf8 Rxf8 8.Rc1
>Qb5 9.Nxh7 Kxh7
>  ±  (1.08)   Depth: 16   01:17:22  980973kN
>1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bf5 4.Rxc5 Bxc5 5.g4 Bg6 6.h5 Bh7 7.Bxf8 Rxf8 8.Rc1
>Qb5 9.Nxh7 Kxh7
>  ±  (1.08)   Depth: 17   01:44:39  1343476kN
>1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bf5 4.g4 Bg6 5.h5 Bh7 6.Bxf8 Rxf8 7.Rxc5 Bxc5
>8.Nxh7
>  ±  (1.16)   Depth: 18   04:10:48  3296287kN
>1.Nxh6 gxh6 2.Bxh6 Qa4 3.Ng5 Bg6 4.h5 Bf5 5.g4 Bh7 6.Bxf8
>  ±  (1.16)   Depth: 19   08:50:43  7150366kN
>
>(Lee, Pensacola, Fl 30.08.2001)
>
>What are the best settings you've noticed for GT2? I have tried various and just
>use defaults.

(6H*60M/H + 5M)/(8H * 60M/H + 50M) = 365M/485M = .753
800 MHz/1200 Mhz = .667

.09 from the ratio we would expect by direct computation based on MHz alone.
Hash table settings, cache size, other things in memory and exact CPU family
could easily explain any small differences that we see.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.