Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 08:18:50 09/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2001 at 10:59:24, Uri Blass wrote: >>>Crafty 17.14 2563 300 259 18 23 268.0 89.3 2207 >>>Crafty 18.10 2561 372 309 43 20 330.5 88.8 2212 >>>Crafty 17.12 2516 192 149 27 16 162.5 84.6 2225 >>>Crafty 18.07 2492 336 261 41 34 281.5 83.8 2211 >>> >>>Only sure thing is, that 18.7 was weak... >> >>Sure ??? Are you kidding ? Look at the error bars. >>These results are very well compatible with the statement that Crafty 18.07 is >>the strongest version. The statistics is far too poor to say anything. >>Uli > >No > >2563-23>2492+41 so it seems clear that 17.14 is better than 18.07 even in the >optimistic assumption for 18.07 and the passimistic assumption for 17.14 > >I believe that these results clearly suggest that 18.07 is not the strongest >version. It's rather obvious judging from the comment made by Uli, that he thought that the two numbers following the rating were the error bars. That would be a more prudent assumption than the inability to understand simple arithmetic. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.