Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:59:24 09/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2001 at 09:17:30, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On September 04, 2001 at 04:36:58, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On September 04, 2001 at 04:13:47, Chris Taylor wrote: >> >>>On September 04, 2001 at 02:26:23, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>Bob has obviously abandoned 2 weeks version cycle, which is good!! I prefer >>>>to get new version, when it's really better than old. E.g. in Junior's case >>>>after 1,5 years! >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>I have a feeling there will be more versions! >>>If I had a large amount of money, and the betting shop was a tad nearer. I >>>would, have a flutter. But then again, I am not a betting man? >>> >>>In auto232 matches I have 18.10 from bob's site doing rather well. It seems to >>>be getteing stronger with each release. >>> >>I am not so sure. Look at this rating list from Herrmann: >> >>Crafty 17.14 2563 300 259 18 23 268.0 89.3 2207 >>Crafty 18.10 2561 372 309 43 20 330.5 88.8 2212 >>Crafty 17.12 2516 192 149 27 16 162.5 84.6 2225 >>Crafty 18.07 2492 336 261 41 34 281.5 83.8 2211 >> >>Only sure thing is, that 18.7 was weak... > >Sure ??? Are you kidding ? Look at the error bars. >These results are very well compatible with the statement that Crafty 18.07 is >the strongest version. The statistics is far too poor to say anything. >Uli No 2563-23>2492+41 so it seems clear that 17.14 is better than 18.07 even in the optimistic assumption for 18.07 and the passimistic assumption for 17.14 I believe that these results clearly suggest that 18.07 is not the strongest version. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.