Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:56:51 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 12:13:07, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >It is actually quite simple: most people who have played frequently against a >prog have tried "weird" openings which the comp did not understand and most of >those people know how to make the prog go in to positions where it does not >shine bright, it is obviously quite individual, from the responses i got to my >post, how people define "anti comp", therefore if anyone takes the challenge it >should be under the agreement that the person does not use hi's or her's >variation of anti comp play, just play the board trying to find the best >possible move from and equal position. > >Regards >Jonas > >PS: before this goes out of hand, i fell like making a legal disclaimer :) Jonas, let's play a game of chess! As soon as we start, I will try to play an opening I know better. I will try to get us into a position that you (hopefully) won't understand as well as I do. I think that's the point of chess. You do what you have to, in order to win. :) Slate > >This is my own attempt to define "anti comp" play, it be objective, subjective >or whatever come to mind, it is still just an opinion on my behalf. >If you accept the challenge and find a winning sac then of course be my guest >and kill the comp, i have no personal issues involved in this challenge: it is a >mere suggestion, take it or leave, i am open for debate though :) > >Regards >Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.