Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 05:02:07 11/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2001 at 07:50:26, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 12, 2001 at 06:44:08, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On November 12, 2001 at 06:22:04, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>This position could happen in my crrespondence game >>> >>>[D]2r2rk1/p3q1pp/1p6/2bp1p2/4n3/1P2P1P1/PB3PBP/1QR1RbK1 w - - 0 25 >>> >>>If your program plays Bxe4 then it is materialistic(Bxe4 is the only move that >>>does not lose material) >>> >>>If it plays Rxf1 then it is not materialistic >>> >>>It seems that most programs are not materialistic based on the test that I did. >>>I guess also that most humans are not materialistic here and are going to prefer >>>Rxf1 >>> >>>Uri >> >>Yes at least Yace and Crafty likes to take Rxf1. I quess the reason is, that >>after Bxe4 fxe4 Rxf1 f3-square is very weak. And this weakness is more than >>giving rook against bishop and pawn. >> >>BTW have You lost any corr game lately?! >> >>Jouni > >No > >My result in the Israeli correspondence championship are: >1/2 final >+4 =2 >3/4 final >+7 =0 >final >+5 =3 >[it is +4 =3 but I am sure that I win the last game(I have more than a queen >advantage based on the evaluation of programs)] > >Uri So You must challenge World Champion Timmerman next! Or may be not? I don't see any players from Israel in world TOP200, even if there is 7 from Finland! Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.