Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 18:09:37 11/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2001 at 21:02:45, James Swafford wrote: >So you're arguing my original point. After some consideration >I think either approach is fine. I think it's silly not to limit if the limit doesn't cost anything and may save you ass someday or in some freak positions. >Or are you proposing something else? Perhaps a different depth or >something dynamic? I use max quiescent depth = nominal search depth * 2 -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.