Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 13:47:50 12/20/01

Go up one level in this thread

On December 20, 2001 at 14:15:43, Christophe Theron wrote:

>So they should not be commercial. I was talking about top commercial programs.
>
>If you are taking the worst commercial programs as a reference, you can indeed
>prove anything.
>
>
>
>    Christophe

You _really_ narrow down the field for the commercials a lot here.

You pick a professional : Chess Tiger.

Lemme pick an amateur : Yace.

OK - you win .

How many commercial programs can be really sure to win this kind of "betting
battle" ?

Regards,
pete

• Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Christophe Theron 18:21:41 12/20/01
  • Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Peter Berger 07:10:42 12/21/01
    • Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Christophe Theron 09:26:08 12/21/01
      • Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Peter Berger 11:11:29 12/21/01
      • Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Aaron Tay 11:04:00 12/21/01
  • Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Russell Reagan 22:01:08 12/20/01
    • Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Christophe Theron 09:22:23 12/21/01
      • Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength Tony Werten 14:54:08 12/21/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.