Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 10:03:47 06/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 1998 at 10:34:46, Peter Herttrich wrote: >On June 15, 1998 at 15:00:08, Moritz Berger wrote: > >>On June 15, 1998 at 14:37:12, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>>Posted by Vincent Diepeveen on June 15, 1998 at 13:26:04: >>> >>>>It's just so that cg5 book is a little older than rebel9 book so logically >>>>rebel has been cooked against cg5. >>> >>>Wrong. >>> >>>As usual. >>> >>>Rebel books only contain hand typed opening moves from (printed) theory >>>books. >>> >>>- Ed - >> >>... and everybody knows that the G5 book contains several onions ... > >Ok, you take the book and i take the onions. >And i think this discussion will not guide to anything. I have to disagree. For the last year and a half Vincent claimed that Rebel books are full of killer lines and that this would be the reason of Rebel's good performance in the SSDF games. This discussion may serve a purpose if we clear this issue one way or another. So far we saw no proof at all of any cooks in Rebel books. If all Vincent has to show after 18 months is the lines he posted yesterday, then he has no grounds at all to sustain his accusation. Enrique >Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.