Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:29:09 02/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2002 at 03:12:14, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 14, 2002 at 02:46:36, Slater Wold wrote: >[snip] >>My main thinking here is: >> >>Rebel will more than likely win 75% of its games against Crafty in the 40/120. >>Now if Crafty can beat Rebel 75% of the time in the 40/12000, what does that >>show? That Crafty is "rebel strength" when given a 100x time odds? Or that >>simply HW = chess program performance? Well, I think all that will be >>determined in the moves in makes in the time odds games. >> >>Little Goliath vs Shredder was something that GCP suggested. LG is extremly >>fast, and from what I understand, not overly complex. Shredder on the other >>hand is as slow as they come, and again, from what I understand, very complex. >> >>Does MHZ = ELO. And if it does, how much? Imagine the stink if Rebel were to >>win 75% in 40/120 and 75% in 40/12000. > >I am guessing that Rebel is about 100 ELO stronger than crafty. I also believe >(on scanty evidence based on the chess in 2010 experiment) that the advantage >vanishes at very long time control. I agree that the difference is probably more closer to 100 elo than 200 elo but I do not believe that the difference vanishes at long time control. I believe that it was truth in the past because Rebel had search holes because of it's selective search algorithm but I guess that Ed improved his program from that time. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.