Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New paradigm in action

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 23:04:56 02/18/02

Go up one level in this thread


On February 18, 2002 at 16:19:46, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On February 18, 2002 at 14:35:42, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>[White "Sjeng 12.8"]
>
>
>try sjeng against
>
>fritz7.0.06
>shredder6.32
>hiarcs7.32
>junior7
>
>and come again...

Even if my post had been remotely serious, which it wasn't, since
I think you and this whole topic are nothing but a TROLL, I'd still
ask you WHAT WOULD BE THE FRIGGING POINT?

I don't need to play such a mach to know the result. Sjeng 'll lose.
You're going to blame that on the 'new paradigm'? Geez, I would have
thought it had something to do with the fact that your list consists
of professional chessprograms who authors have put hours and hours into
perfecting their programs, and I'm just an amateur that messes around
in his spare time.

But yes, I must be mistaken. Sjeng can't possibly be 'new paradigm'
when it doesn't trounce the top 10 of the SSDF. And when it does so,
all those other programmers are fools for putting so much work in
testing and improving their programs, when they could have been
new paradigm-ing instead. HOW STUPID OF THEM! YOU ARE SO SMART!

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.