Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To win the wc of computerchess means nothing.

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:48:48 03/24/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 24, 2002 at 12:19:56, stuart taylor wrote:

>On March 24, 2002 at 10:39:47, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On March 24, 2002 at 06:56:13, Michael Vox wrote:
>>
>>>On March 23, 2002 at 10:19:21, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>Of course, that says _nothing_ about comp vs human competition...
>>>
>>>Shredder v Gulko 1-0
>>>
>>>Here are the results from SSDF, which is a statistically significant amount of
>>>bot v bot games.
>>>
>>>1 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz  2715
>>>
>>>Based on the facts I think the truth is clear :)
>>>
>>>Shredder 6.0 is currently the number one program in the world.  However, this
>>>could change at some point in the future.
>>
>>
>>That conclusion is so badly flawed it is almost funny.  How can you conclude
>>that when shredder 6 has not played most of the _current_ chess programs?  And
>>I'm not talking about the versions that the SSDF has, but the versions that
>>each author is currently working on?
>>
>>No way to make such a statement and have it based on fact.  If you want to
>>change it to "S6 is better than any engine the SSDF is testing." then it
>>has a better chance of standing up under scrutiny.
>
>Isn't he talking about all released programs?
>S.Taylor


Shouldn't he have _stated_ that.  It simply said "number 1, period".

And even then it would be wrong.  Fritz 7 has been released since the last
WC event.  Shredder doesn't quite seem as strong based on results within the
SSDF and elsewhere...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.