Author: sean
Date: 15:04:25 04/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2002 at 14:53:38, Chessfun wrote: >On April 11, 2002 at 12:52:12, sean wrote: > >>On April 10, 2002 at 22:55:21, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 10, 2002 at 22:13:08, sean wrote: >>> >>>>On April 10, 2002 at 15:36:50, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 10, 2002 at 13:30:21, jamal wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Just wanted to check if there were any updates for chess tiger 14 or gambit >>>>>>tiger 2.0 >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks in advance >>>>> >>>>>AFAIK none, excluding what is available on the subscription page gambit book >>>>>etc. It must be remembered that 14 and 2.0 were already free upgrades. >>>>> >>>>>Sarah. >>>> >>>>They were supposed to be fixes, not upgrades, and chessbase care about their >>>>clients, thats why. >>> >>> >>>Your statement makes no sense, how did chessbase come up? >>> >>>Anyway your wrong, they were not "fixes", it was simply a free upgrade. >>>This upgrade came with stronger engines plus extra playing styles for Gambit and >>>tablebase use. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >> >>Do you deny that tiger 14 has a learning problem, tiger 12 has it too, Ed has >>stated this on two seperate ocasions, and he also said it would be fixed in >>version 14, which it was not, it is easy to book up against, it can beat every >>time with the antiborg opening when tiger is using its engine book, user books >>weaken tigers general playing strenth, > > >Tiger has been #1 on the SSDF's lists, so the learning problem wasn't really so >apparent for the other programs to figure out. > >As far as the anti-borg systems that were used on ICC it was very simple to >write a small add.bk book with a couple of lines and have this as well as ct.tbk >open. > >However this subject is far from the original topic which was "Are there any >chess tiger 14 updates". > > >>I have been a member of the tiger forum >>for over a year, so dont say I dont know what Im talking about, I was one of the >>first to discover tigers problem, > > >Wow our hero... > > >>I believe you knew about it long before >>anybody and were hoping it would just slide by people, > > >So then if you were "one of the first" then I was first....wow I'm my own hero >;-) > > >> it has cost me $100, I >>will be spending my money else where from now on, > > >Not sure why you paid $100 but that's your problem. Even so $100 for Tiger which >included Century and Gambit and followed up with a free upgrade I'd say you got >your money's worth. I'd also bet the number of satisfied Tiger customers >outweigh others. > > >>I personaly think the $Rebel$ >>company are liers and your support sucks. > > >Rather sadly everyone is entitled to their own opinion, it's like having a vote. >It's well known that some people vote without knowing what their voting about or >for. Seems the same to me. > >Sarah. Whats sad is all the idiots totaly defending them like they are perfect, ok lets say Im totaly wrong and tiger is perfect and their support isnt sucky at all, and Im imagining that they only answer questions on their forum when it suits them ect ect ect, I must have been born yesterday then, I wouldnt like any of those people being durors.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.