Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 20:55:21 04/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 11, 2002 at 18:04:25, sean wrote:
>On April 11, 2002 at 14:53:38, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On April 11, 2002 at 12:52:12, sean wrote:
>>
>>>On April 10, 2002 at 22:55:21, Chessfun wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 10, 2002 at 22:13:08, sean wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 10, 2002 at 15:36:50, Chessfun wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On April 10, 2002 at 13:30:21, jamal wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Just wanted to check if there were any updates for chess tiger 14 or gambit
>>>>>>>tiger 2.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks in advance
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AFAIK none, excluding what is available on the subscription page gambit book
>>>>>>etc. It must be remembered that 14 and 2.0 were already free upgrades.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sarah.
>>>>>
>>>>>They were supposed to be fixes, not upgrades, and chessbase care about their
>>>>>clients, thats why.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Your statement makes no sense, how did chessbase come up?
>>>>
>>>>Anyway your wrong, they were not "fixes", it was simply a free upgrade.
>>>>This upgrade came with stronger engines plus extra playing styles for Gambit and
>>>>tablebase use.
>>>>
>>>>Sarah.
>>>
>>>
>>>Do you deny that tiger 14 has a learning problem, tiger 12 has it too, Ed has
>>>stated this on two seperate ocasions, and he also said it would be fixed in
>>>version 14, which it was not, it is easy to book up against, it can beat every
>>>time with the antiborg opening when tiger is using its engine book, user books
>>>weaken tigers general playing strenth,
>>
>>
>>Tiger has been #1 on the SSDF's lists, so the learning problem wasn't really so
>>apparent for the other programs to figure out.
>>
>>As far as the anti-borg systems that were used on ICC it was very simple to
>>write a small add.bk book with a couple of lines and have this as well as ct.tbk
>>open.
>>
>>However this subject is far from the original topic which was "Are there any
>>chess tiger 14 updates".
>>
>>
>>>I have been a member of the tiger forum
>>>for over a year, so dont say I dont know what Im talking about, I was one of the
>>>first to discover tigers problem,
>>
>>
>>Wow our hero...
>>
>>
>>>I believe you knew about it long before
>>>anybody and were hoping it would just slide by people,
>>
>>
>>So then if you were "one of the first" then I was first....wow I'm my own hero
>>;-)
>>
>>
>>> it has cost me $100, I
>>>will be spending my money else where from now on,
>>
>>
>>Not sure why you paid $100 but that's your problem. Even so $100 for Tiger which
>>included Century and Gambit and followed up with a free upgrade I'd say you got
>>your money's worth. I'd also bet the number of satisfied Tiger customers
>>outweigh others.
>>
>>
>>>I personaly think the $Rebel$
>>>company are liers and your support sucks.
>>
>>
>>Rather sadly everyone is entitled to their own opinion, it's like having a vote.
>>It's well known that some people vote without knowing what their voting about or
>>for. Seems the same to me.
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>
>Whats sad is all the idiots totaly defending them like they are perfect, ok lets
>say Im totaly wrong and tiger is perfect and their support isnt sucky at all,
>and Im imagining that they only answer questions on their forum when it suits
>them ect ect ect, I must have been born yesterday then, I wouldnt like any of
>those people being durors.
If you have something *interesting* to complain about, I'm here all the time.
Saying that Tiger 14 was a "fix" is neither interesting nor true.
I don't know what kind of support you expect if you start by spreading lies.
Now if you are not satisfied with the Tiger 14 upgrade, I'm going to send you a
refund. Tell me, how much did you pay to get your Tiger 14 upgrade?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.