Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 14:27:13 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 17:22:42, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>Why should I have to define all my terms? There simple enough to grasp. >> >>Appearently not. > >Then reason it out. I know a computer can't do that. None in 2002 that is. This is what Russel and I have pointed out. If you define your terms as 'something a compuer can't do', then yes, there's no point at all in arguing over this, and you're always going to be 'right'. >>My brain is just neurons firing away. You can actually simulate that within >>a computer program. > >Only on a very limited scale. I haven't met "Data" yet. Sure. But it's the same principle :) >Then I pity you, as I am not so simple in my design. It's an entirely human treat to think more highly of yourself :) -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.