Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What made Deep blue good? What will make programs much better now?

Author: Chris Carson

Date: 10:22:06 07/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 08, 2002 at 12:48:58, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On July 08, 2002 at 11:34:36, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>>I too am a DB fan.  Just like Bob.
>>>
>>>But I actually agree with you here.  I don't think DB did anything
>>>*spectacular*.
>>
>>I totally disagree.  Their speed _was_ "spectacular".  And that was _the_
>>point of Deep Blue, after all.  Not the point everyone _wants_ to be the
>>point of deep blue, but _the point_ the team developed over 10 years...
>>
>
>Here is a crazy thought, why not simulate DB?
>Given all the papers, I think it should be possible to modify Craft to use the
>same eval and extensions. We turn off hashing, nullmove, SEE and whatever DB
>didn't have. Then we find a slow machine for Tiger and a super fast one for
>Crafty, so Crafty (in DB-mode) has a 200 nps fold advantage.
>
>Ok lot of work, but seems this is the never ending story :)
>
>-S.

Good idea!  see: http://www.rebel.nl/match.htm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.