Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:28:44 07/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2002 at 13:22:06, Chris Carson wrote: >On July 08, 2002 at 12:48:58, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On July 08, 2002 at 11:34:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>>I too am a DB fan. Just like Bob. >>>> >>>>But I actually agree with you here. I don't think DB did anything >>>>*spectacular*. >>> >>>I totally disagree. Their speed _was_ "spectacular". And that was _the_ >>>point of Deep Blue, after all. Not the point everyone _wants_ to be the >>>point of deep blue, but _the point_ the team developed over 10 years... >>> >> >>Here is a crazy thought, why not simulate DB? >>Given all the papers, I think it should be possible to modify Craft to use the >>same eval and extensions. We turn off hashing, nullmove, SEE and whatever DB >>didn't have. Then we find a slow machine for Tiger and a super fast one for >>Crafty, so Crafty (in DB-mode) has a 200 nps fold advantage. >> >>Ok lot of work, but seems this is the never ending story :) >> >>-S. > >Good idea! see: http://www.rebel.nl/match.htm You do realize that (a) the match was ended after exactly one game? (b) Ed ran _another_ experiment matching Crafty _and_ rebel at something like two hours per move? Do you know the result of _that_ match (not a handicap match, just both programs running long enough to simulate hardware available in say 10 years...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.