Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:33:12 09/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2002 at 16:25:23, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 03, 2002 at 16:23:20, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>On September 03, 2002 at 16:10:33, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On September 03, 2002 at 15:56:10, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>Wrong. Please re-read Vincent's message. "64k on Cray" *probably* was Bob's >>>>number, but "44k in Crafty" not -- at least I cannot deduce that from Vincent's >>>>message. >>> >>>I have it in personal email :) >> >>Does it says that all 44k are always copied? Because code definitely copies much >>less. > >I think that's what Robert implied (sorry, email is on another machine). > >But I agree with you that's not what looks like the code does. > >I just wanted to point out Vincent never made up the 44k number, it was >Robert that told Vincent that was his overhead. > >-- >GCP Again, "max overhead". Which might on rare occasions actually be hit. Perhaps in fine 70 after several minutes, it might have to copy most of that stuff... This was when vincent was telling you your split overhead was too high, and I pointed out mine _could_ be significantly higher with no ill effects since fine 70 runs just "fine" on my box.. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.