Author: Mark Young
Date: 14:33:39 10/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2002 at 15:39:34, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On October 02, 2002 at 10:00:45, Paul Doire wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>5 Quick 4 minute games (for what they are worth)
>
>Therein lies the rub. Similar results were had with GLC, but it turns out that
>GLC (too) is being run over rough-shod, like everyone else.
>
>>P3 450Mhz, crafty 24mb ram, ruffian 32mb ram, 128MB system, Win 98
>>3,4 and some 5 man TB's, own books played under Winboard 4.2.6
>>
>>Crafty_1714 vs Ruffian_101 +3-0=2
>
>5 games have little meaning.
>
>>Does older Crafty have Ruffians number?,
>
>I doubt it. Unless you are running Crafty on a 4 CPU box. ;-)
>
>>Anyone else tried this yet?
>
>Here is a ten game match at G/60 between two titans:
>
> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
> 1 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2554 244 142 10 65.0 % 2446 50.0 %
> 2 Crafty-19.0 : 2446 142 244 10 35.0 % 2554 50.0 %
>
>[games to follow]
>
>Ten games are also totally unconvincing. However, I think we can see from the
>pure volume of games that have been trundled under Ruffian's hooves that Ruffian
>is a force to be dealt with.
What force. I must have been getting bogus copies of Ruffian. It is good, but I
would not call it a force... The more I test Ruffian and at longer time
controls the worse Ruffian scores.
Here is my current test..still running.
My Crafty has been out scoring Ruffian in almost all my tests.
P4 2.8 Ghz 1 GB Ram.
Tiger book used for all programs.
Each program has its own copy of the tiger book. Book learning is carried over
for each test.
Blitz:15'+15" 0
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Hiarcs 7.32 ** 1 00 11 1 1 5.0/7
2 Deep Fritz 7 0 ** ½½ ½ ½1 1 4.0/7
3 Chess Tiger 14.0 11 ½½ ** 0 0 ½ 3.5/7 15.00
4 Junior 6.0 00 ½ 1 ** 1 ½½ 3.5/7 10.50
5 Crafty 18.15 0 ½0 1 0 ** 1½ 3.0/7
6 Ruffian 1.0.1 0 0 ½ ½½ 0½ ** 2.0/7
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.