Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating lis

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 11:28:23 10/21/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 21, 2002 at 12:15:23, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>a)
>since at SSDF they are testing at 120'/40 [many thanks for this great work] but
>95% of all users are (only) playing blitz games
>
An interesting statement. I wonder if it is true that 95% of the users prefer
blitz games, wouldn't it be more useful if the SSDF tested the programs at a
faster time control? Although it is true that slow time controls improve the
quality of the games, it might be a bad idea to test at time controls only a
tiny group of people use.

• Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating Fernando Villegas 17:51:50 10/21/02
  • Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating Bob Durrett 18:39:17 10/21/02
    • Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating Peter Berger 08:25:30 10/22/02
      • We need Formal SSDF Blitz Evaluations [NT] Bob Durrett 08:41:22 10/22/02
• Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating lis Uri Blass 11:31:46 10/21/02
  • Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating lis Peter Berger 11:36:00 10/21/02
    • Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating lis Uri Blass 12:16:25 10/21/02
      • Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating lis Peter Berger 12:27:36 10/21/02
        • Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating lis Uri Blass 12:44:49 10/21/02
        • Re: DESPERATE to have everything new already tested for next SSDF rating lis Bob Durrett 12:44:34 10/21/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.