Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Languages revisited. Functional language beats C for number cruncing

Author: Dan Andersson

Date: 09:38:30 01/10/03

Go up one level in this thread


I tend to use high level languages for just the reason of brevity. Why on earth
write 1k lines when I can get away with 50-100 in a decent language. And the
number of bugs tend to be linear to the length of the program. And for testing
and developement of algorithms I use Forth. That gives me interactive testing.

MvH Dan Andersson



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.