Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Languages revisited. Functional language beats C for number cruncing

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 15:53:29 01/10/03

Go up one level in this thread

On January 10, 2003 at 10:02:26, Dan Andersson wrote:

>The ill feelings and reservation most
>people feel, IMO they originate from the 'toy' implementations of the past.

Are you referring to the Scheme implementation Dr. Scheme? That's what we used
in my first semester CS class. It was...different :)

• Re: Languages revisited. Functional language beats C for number cruncing Dan Andersson 16:10:31 01/10/03
  • Re: Languages revisited. Functional language beats C for number cruncing Russell Reagan 16:29:15 01/10/03
    • Re: Languages revisited. Functional language beats C for number cruncing Dan Andersson 16:50:53 01/10/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.