Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 11:53:48 02/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2003 at 07:50:07, Albert Silver wrote: >>>>We should not leave away the CC aspect of the debate here! The point is that in >>>>their eternal impostering comps play that way. And Bob claimed that in his view >>>>GM played in that same style. At times! I said No! >>> >>>GM Mecking did this in his first come back match. He saw a game that appealed to >>>him, and on the spot decided he would use that line. GM Darcy Lima is known >>>widely to often do his preparation for only some 20 minutes before a round. He >>>is the president of the federation so he is quite busy and that is >>>understandable to a degree, but it is common for him. >>> >> >>IMO it is a form of being slow-witted to give these two examples. Because they >>both do NOT prove what they allegedly could. > >Prove what they could? I don't understand what you are talking about. Sorry Albert, I didn't want to reveil your lingual difficulties with the English language. My sentence is crystal clear! Let me repeat: You gave examples. For a specific reason. I said these two do NOT prove what you want them to prove. Please try to ask for a local help if you still cant understand. >I merely >gave two clear-cut examples of GMs (I wouldn't dream of calling them dumb as you >suggest) Please try to behave, Albert. I did not do what you think here. Please try to get help. > who played material they had not investigated thoroughly. Not even by a >far shot. And I say, that you don't know what you are talking about, Alburt. You insult me. I already explained that a GM, Albert!!! A GM who get's such lines and who has a repertoire - didn't you understand what I said? With that repertoire a GM can do a very fast analysis. Even without a board, Albert!! >You said such cases never occurred and I gave you two examples I know >of. Pretty simple, no? Nope! You are lost in a circular argument. I said with GM that can't exist by defiition, ok?! > >Both the players mentioned I know quite well. I gave classes to Mecking for >several weeks (I have lots of pictures BTW), including specific software usage >training for the Olympiads, and was a business partner of Darcy. Excuse me Albert, that it seems, as if I would NOT respect you and your honours. WRONG!! I respect you, but you simply don't understand what I'm talking about. Look, as a psychologe I have a different reasoning than a business expert. Mecking for instance once was one of the Worlds strongest GM!n Without a doubt he's eidetic. And he had a repertoire. Now if you give him some analyses he's able to digest your stuff in much less time than an amateur. He can see on a fly what your line could be good for. You seem to disbelieve me? > >BTW, why do you go about repeating my name 7 times in your short reply? I'm in train of hypnothizing you! I want to confirm you that I do respect you and that I am determined to open your eyes, so that you might understand me. But against language holes I can't do much. Also, I give your name because it characterizes our private and personal atmosphere. This is very delicate because you are misunderstanding so much. And because at the same time you appear so patronizing as if you were angry that I even dared to oppose your arguments. But here - I want to confirm you - you won't succeed with that style. Because I have a very clear counter strategy. Simple science! And you like Kasparov won't be able to put things on their head, beware! I will refutate all false examples and theories. Your two were very easy ones. And I will secure that I will remain from polite so that if you again run away the burden will remain on your shoulders. Here are too many readers who will understand what is going on. In rgcc many judge from a superficial level. So here it is way better for me with my sound arguments. And note, I'm not patronizing. I won't run aroud like mad if you might finally understand as if I were a genius. How could I in such a trivial question. What I find very telling is how people try to talk with me - in what a tone! With what a weak logical strength. With what pompousness. Only because I have to record as a chess programmer. Rolf Tueschen > > Albert
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.