Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Statistical methods and their consequences

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 19:16:24 02/15/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 15, 2003 at 17:21:10, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>On February 15, 2003 at 15:54:15, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>>The question "Present them in alphabetical order?" shows the complete lack of
>>>understanding statistics and also the unwillingness to digest the messages
>>>already made. I said what should/must be done.
>>
>>I must have missed this. What do you propose SSDF do exactly? Give me a clear
>>example of how you would present the data or correct what you believe is wrong.
>>
>
>
>Could you tell me your references in the business and SSDF? Then I would repeat
>it for you with pleasure. I think you crossed that line of decency too often in
>the past. You missed a lot of things, that's correct. Education and all. To deny
>such obvious science stuff, I was talking about, is outrageous misbehaviour in
>this environment here. Either give respect a chance and stop your intentional
>misquotings or leave me alone. Period.

What are you talking about? You said "I said what should/must be done." Fine, so
I asked what exactly you had in mind and your answer is to ask me for my
references and start talking about misquoting??? Either you have a 'solution
'for the SSDF or you don't.

                                  Albert

>Rolf Tueschen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.