Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:48:19 02/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2003 at 16:36:09, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 16, 2003 at 16:12:06, Peter Berger wrote: > >>What do I miss here? Nxg4 looked ugly, still it was a good move - I haven't seen >>any analysis suggesting a win for white in this game. > >With a small but long-term advantage. Look into the different comments. If you >can't find it I will have a look. But Kasparov chose a different line. BTW the >better line was already mentioned on the Fritz server. Ok, Peter, if you want, >you can also claim that a comp could defend with - say - bad bishop against good >one or whatever. Against a comp that isn't won yet. But talking about super-GM >... > >I think that your short message claimed something very modern today. Also Amir >has adopted that logic. He has a 3-3 against whom? Well against the best human >SUPER-GM. So, Amir is correct, DJ is also a SUPER-GM. > No Rolf, my comment is only about chess - I am convinced that Nxg4 is simply the very strongest move and everything else is garbage. Feel welcome to challenge this assessment with analysis either of your own or published one - but please don't forget to add another move that leads to at least a position of similar merit. I think Nxg4 is a very good example for a move played by a computer that looks weak to amateurs unless they spend a lot of time looking at the position and has the potential to even fool players of higher strength. It looks messy, but is strong. Regards, Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.