Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:57:59 02/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2003 at 15:38:30, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 15, 2003 at 15:26:13, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 15, 2003 at 14:52:10, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On February 15, 2003 at 14:34:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>> Answer me this, What Difference Does it make if you play more >>>>>positional chess, if you cannot defeated me?? >>>> >>>>If that were the case, I would agree. But by the same token, do you want >>>>your program to play 30 brilliant moves and one lemon move, over and over? >>>>That one lemon will drag your performance _way_ down at the top of the rating >>>>scale. >>> >>> >>>Bob, may I point out with humility that this is exactly my weak-chain argument? >>>Finally we are on the point. Did you ever reflect what would happen if >>> >>> - in a really recompensating money atmosphere and >>> >>> - after top players adopted specific comp related chess? >>> >>>And that on the base of a known permanent weakness? >>> >>>That is the point. And not the typical hype based on show events /commercials. >>> >>>What is you impression with the GM play on ICC? But note, Roman D. had to face >>>an always changed version [on the base of his own hints]. Guess what will happen >>>if several top GM work hard on a counter strategy against comps, in other words >>>if GM adopt 'Eduard'... >> >> >>You clearly have no clue as to what actually happens. > > >Note that nobody here must come with humility! It was a bit irony by me. But - >you are a bit too respectless. Why? > >Here you completely miss my point. You should read it again and always think >about tournament times. Not Blitz. You seem to have finally answered your own question. http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?285129 Sarah > >>Roman may be good against comps and there are other GM's and IM's that are, and >>there are also many, that try daily over and over and over and simply see loss >>after loss after loss. >> >>Scrappy has been playing jnogueiras who is GM Jesús Nogueiras Santiago >>for days and scrappy has been slaughtering him. While IM Alexis Cabrera handle >>Minotauro has for the most part scored about even. >> >>Point being that some maybe able to adapt their game to an anti-computer type >>play (trading pieces etc) others never manage despite playing endlessly. >> >>Sarah. >> >> >> >> >>>Only then, and that is my argument since long, the actual commercial progs begin >>>to SUCK. But on a permanent base! >>> >>>My questions to Amir went a bit in the same direction. Let's see how far the >>>experts can open their mind. >>> >>>Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.