Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 10:30:12 08/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2003 at 13:15:31, Peter Berger wrote: >On August 20, 2003 at 11:42:30, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>>The question is if there is some proof that your book is superior. >>> >> >>Tell me now if this statement is not a disqualification (Sorry, we must >>*believe* that a cheap Blass declaration is the absoulete true). Do you really >>know who is Jeroen Noomen? Do you have any idea? >> >>>The question is if the top programs do better against strong amateurs when both >>>sides use book and not when the sides play the nunn match. >>> >> >>If you dont know it: the book is a component of a chess program. I dont know if >>you remember the game between Yace and Shredder in Paderborn 2003 when Yace >>beated Shredder due to a combined preparation: Dieter (program tuning) + Pesce >>(book). >> > >I don't think this is an accurate summary of this game. To me it looked as if >Yace simply outplayed Shredder in the endgame. The opening was OK - nothing >more, nothing less. Hi, I do agree 100% with Jeroen. About this game this is a superficial analysis. The problem here was that Shredder book ended after move 6 and played moves which are week and need a too deep analysis to be evaluated correctly. I mean too deep for a chess engine. So, the opening was not OK. It may look OK, which is something else. This is my opinion. To avoid these kind of problems I have been working a lot on my latest book! Ciao Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.