Author: Peter Berger
Date: 10:15:31 08/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2003 at 11:42:30, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>The question is if there is some proof that your book is superior. >> > >Tell me now if this statement is not a disqualification (Sorry, we must >*believe* that a cheap Blass declaration is the absoulete true). Do you really >know who is Jeroen Noomen? Do you have any idea? > >>The question is if the top programs do better against strong amateurs when both >>sides use book and not when the sides play the nunn match. >> > >If you dont know it: the book is a component of a chess program. I dont know if >you remember the game between Yace and Shredder in Paderborn 2003 when Yace >beated Shredder due to a combined preparation: Dieter (program tuning) + Pesce >(book). > I don't think this is an accurate summary of this game. To me it looked as if Yace simply outplayed Shredder in the endgame. The opening was OK - nothing more, nothing less.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.