Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 08:42:30 08/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
>The question is if there is some proof that your book is superior. > Tell me now if this statement is not a disqualification (Sorry, we must *believe* that a cheap Blass declaration is the absoulete true). Do you really know who is Jeroen Noomen? Do you have any idea? >The question is if the top programs do better against strong amateurs when both >sides use book and not when the sides play the nunn match. > If you dont know it: the book is a component of a chess program. I dont know if you remember the game between Yace and Shredder in Paderborn 2003 when Yace beated Shredder due to a combined preparation: Dieter (program tuning) + Pesce (book). I dont see any relation about running the engines without books or with the Nunn Positions and the matter of the book. ???? What are you trying to prove here? >Looking at the results of Deep Sjeng or Gandalf at WBEC I am not convinced about >it. > >Based on results they seem to be not better than programs like Aristarch or >Ruffian. Do you know that the Chess Partner Book of Sjeng is different from the Native Sjeng Book? The Chess Partner Book of Sjeng is created by Jeroen Noomen but I am not sure about the Sjeng Native Book. I am not sure what you are talking about here. ??? > >I am sure that the books that are used in world championship are different but >it seems that at least the book of the commercial product is not superior(I can >add the fact that Kurt who tested Ruffian against the commercial programs when >both sides use the same book found relatively better result for Ruffian when >every program used its book) Put a random book with a chess program and face it against a Kure Book. I can assure and prove you that your asumption is false again. Arturo Ochoa.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.